Is low code better than no code?

Estimated read time 6 min read

Since the emergence of hole-punch programming in 1804, programming languages ​​have existed for more than 200 years. Since the 1950s, new programming languages ​​have continued to emerge, and there are now more than 250 kinds. This means that the most important thing developers need to get used to is constant change.

A recent change in the programming world is integrated development environments (IDEs)—software applications that generally include tools such as code editors, compilers, debuggers, and graphical user interfaces. It provides professional developers and programming enthusiasts with a set of tools that simplify coding.

Programmers already write enough code that starting every application from scratch is pointless. In fact, when a robust low-code development platform contains visual code blocks that contain 90% of the functionality required by most applications, most of the heavy lifting can be done using this low-code platform.

1. What is low code? How to use low code?

Simply put, low-code development is a way for developers to design applications quickly and with minimal hand coding. Using low-code can be a noun because it is the same “thing” as in Python or C#. Low-code can also be a verb to refer to a literal approach to developing an application, since less handwritten code is used than normal when developing an application.

A low-code platform is similar to an IDE in that it contains a set of features that complement the way developers work and the tools they need. However, it is not just a traditional IDE. Simply put, low-code is the process of dragging and dropping visual modules of existing code into a workflow to create an application. Because it can completely replace the traditional method of manually coding the entire application, skilled developers can work smarter and faster without being tied down by repetitive coding.

The alternative is to write thousands of lines of complex code and syntax and debug it. By sidestepping this and building applications through visualization, you can develop applications at least 10x faster and take full advantage of skilled developers.

This is the main reason why Forrester expects spending in the low-code market to reach $21 billion by 2022.

2. The value of low code

  • Greater speed: With low-code, you can build applications for multiple platforms simultaneously and demonstrate working examples to stakeholders within days or even hours.
  • More resources: If you’re working on a big project, with low-code you don’t have to wait for a developer with specialized skills to complete another lengthy project, which means the work can be done faster and at a lower cost.
  • Low risk/high ROI: Low-code, robust security processes, data integration and cross-platform support are already built-in and easily customizable – meaning less risk and more time focusing on your business.
  • Rapid deployment: Launch day can be a nerve-wracking experience. With low-code, pre-deployment impact assessment ensures the application works as expected. If there is any unexpected behavior, you can roll back the changes with a single click.

3. What is no code?

At first glance, it’s easy to confuse low-code and no-code, as they sound the same. No-code solutions are built for people who don’t know, nor need to know, any programming language. No-code vendors have everything users need to build apps already built into the product. No-code solutions are similar to popular blogging platforms or website design companies, which have pre-built pages that users can use to create their own blog or business in minutes.

Sounds good, right? Of course, if you don’t mind releasing an app that has no unique features and is difficult to customize, and if you don’t need to solve the challenges of digital modernization, that’s fine. Additionally, most no-code platforms were originally designed to solve a single business problem, such as business process management.

4. Skills required to use low-code and no-code

There are literally hundreds of small details and features that differentiate a powerful low-code platform from a limited no-code solution. Most of them are not obvious at the UI level, which is where a lot of the confusion between the two comes from.

But limiting our discussion strictly to the act of application development, certain types of users and what they need to develop may drive their preferences for low-code and no-code.

No-code solutions are only suitable for specific business users or citizen developers. They require little professional training. But because the typical user’s skill set is limited, no-code platforms are also limited in their capabilities. For example, the customized workflow of the domestic software ZDOO allows managers who do not understand technology to visually edit and create the required business processes with zero code. And most professional developers find that no-code solutions lack the features they need, and no-code tools tend to limit their ability to work.

Low-code is designed to serve both business users and professional developers. For business users, creating useful and thoughtfully designed applications under experienced IT guidance helps extend the capabilities and bandwidth of the IT team, but also helps with control and governance. For professional developers, the ability to work faster and more efficiently using visualization-based modeling tools, while also allowing them to manually write code as needed, means a reduced permanent backlog of required applications while increasing their business value. is growing.

The appeal of no-code is that almost anyone in an organization with a technical background can quickly create business applications. This can be a huge advantage, but it also creates many problems.

First, the idea that no-code app development actually requires no coding is not always reality. Because these platforms are designed for non-expert developers, IT departments must step in at the final stage to complete integration with existing systems. At this point, “no code” can easily turn into “urgent need for a lot of code.”

So, is it safe to conclude that low-code is better than no-code? it’s not true. Both low-code and no-code are built with agility in mind, and although they may seem the same, they serve different purposes.

Low-code facilitates the development of complex applications that run important, often mission-critical processes at the heart of the business. It’s also suitable for building standalone mobile and web applications that may or may not require complex integrations. In fact, it can be used for almost anything.

Instead, the limitations of no-code mean that it should only be used for front-end use cases.

That being said, in modern businesses there is room for both, or at least a combination of both. For teams adopting DevOps, the combination of low-code and no-code can provide the perfect application development environment.

You May Also Like

More From Author

+ There are no comments

Add yours